9. Podium Event on 9.9.2026 in Hamburg at the Mövenpick Hotel

Increasing compliance requirements in times of protectionism and stagnant growth. Will this turn out well for European SMEs?

In our panel discussion, we will connect the topics of Extended Producer Responsibility and Product Responsibility with the current political and economic situation and examine the challenges for companies from different perspectives. Free of charge for VERE members!

×

German Packing Law: Prevention organisation successfully blocked!

The draft bill for the German Packaging Act Implementation Act (VerpackDG) had proposed the instalment of a central prevention organisation, which was ultimately rejected following widespread criticism. VERE also successfully lodged a protest against such an organisation, as it would have likely resulted in incurred additional costs and significant bureaucratic effort for SMEs.

A draft bill for the German Packaging Law Implementation Act (VerpackDG) suggested creating a prevention organisation – to be financed by domestic businesses at an estimated cost of approximately 89 million euros per year. This organisation would be responsible for implementing measures aimed at waste prevention and reducing packaging. However, a broad alliance of industry, trade and waste management associations had taken a clear stand against the establishment of such an organisation. In a letter to Parliamentary State Secretary Gitta Connemann (CDU) at the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, the associations distinctly called for the provisions to be removed from the Act.

The associations had also criticised the fact that a central prevention organisation, in combination with the associated extension of funding obligations, by far exceeds the guidelines of the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR); Extended Producer Responsibility as well as deposit and return schemes in all Member States, are only required to set aside a minimum proportion of their budget for prevention and reduction measures. An additional body is neither explicitly provided for nor necessary for this purpose. This is now also stated in the current cabinet draft, as it provides that all producers, retailers and other organisations covered by Extended Producer Responsibility should independently fund reduction and prevention measures to minimise and avoid packaging waste.

At this stage, VERE had already expressed concerns and firmly rejected the proposed prevention organisation. The additional financial burden of such an instance would have meant companies needing to pay an additional five euros per tonne of packaging material. On top of this, the lack of a clearly defined and transparent usage for these funds made it difficult to discern any real added value. Having relevant systems and producers co-finance established waste-avoidance measures, based on volume, is entirely sufficient in this regard and continues to be supported by VERE.

In a separate article, we outline specific requirements of the Packaging Law Implementation Act (VerpackDG) as well as the associated expectations placed on companies.

If you would like to get individual training on the EU Packaging Regulation or an assessment of your role within your supply chain, VERE e.V. recommends the PPWR training courses from trade-e-bility. Please feel free to contact our colleagues at trade-e-bility directly on +49 40/750687-300 or send us an email.

Are you not a VERE member yet? Become a VERE member here now and stay up to date with current developments!

Questions? Contact us now without obligation

Seite 1
This field must be filled!
This field must be filled!
This field must be filled!
This field must be filled!
This is not a valid email address!
This field must be filled!
Christoph Brellinger
Contact

Christoph Brellinger
Executive secretary

info@vereev.de